Search for: "Austin v. Department of Veterans Affairs"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm
Department of Veterans Affairs, “Agent Orange exposure and VA disability compensation. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:05 pm
§ 5103(a)(1) to allow the Department of Veterans Affairs to issue evidentiary notice only before receiving a veteran’s claim, even though the statute requires notice that accounts for evidence “not previously provided to the Secretary that is necessary to substantiate the claim”; and (2) whether the Federal Circuit violated the longstanding doctrine of Accardi v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
United States, 14-916, which involves a provision of the Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006 stating that contracting officers at the Department of Veterans Affairs “shall award” contracts on the basis of competition restricted to small businesses owned by veterans whenever there is a “reasonable expectation” that two or more such businesses will bid for the contract at “a fair and… [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
United States, 14-916, involves a provision of the Veterans Benefits Act that requires the Veterans Administration to restrict contracting competition to veteran-owned small businesses when there is a reasonable expectation that at least two such small businesses will submit fair and reasonable offers. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm
He was a veteran of the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 7:48 am
Department of Veterans’ Affairs and United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
To get a better sense of it all, Scott sat down with Brandi Grissom-Swicegood, a veteran news reporter and departing Austin bureau chief of the Dallas Morning News. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson concluded that a 2013 letter he sent to the Justice Department’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) office was not part of any formal FARA filing, so could not be the basis for a charge under a law barring false FARA submissions. [read post]
